Current:Home > NewsAn appeals court finds Florida's social media law unconstitutional-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
An appeals court finds Florida's social media law unconstitutional
View Date:2024-12-23 23:42:00
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — A Florida law intended to punish social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter is an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment, a federal appeals court ruled Monday, dealing a major victory to companies who had been accused by GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis of discriminating against conservative thought.
A three-judge panel of the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously concluded that it was overreach for DeSantis and the Republican-led Florida Legislature to tell the social media companies how to conduct their work under the Constitution's free speech guarantee.
"Put simply, with minor exceptions, the government can't tell a private person or entity what to say or how to say it," said Circuit Judge Kevin Newsom, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, in the opinion. "We hold that it is substantially likely that social media companies — even the biggest ones — are private actors whose rights the First Amendment protects."
The ruling upholds a similar decision by a Florida federal district judge on the law, which was signed by DeSantis in 2021. It was part of an overall conservative effort to portray social media companies as generally liberal in outlook and hostile to ideas outside of that viewpoint, especially from the political right.
"Some of these massive, massive companies in Silicon Valley are exerting a power over our population that really has no precedent in American history," DeSantis said during a May 2021 bill-signing ceremony. "One of their major missions seems to be suppressing ideas."
The panel found that content moderation and curation is constitutionally protected
However, the appeals panel ruled that the tech companies' actions were protected, with Judge Newsom writing that Facebook, Twitter, TikTok and others are "engaged in constitutionally protected expressive activity when they moderate and curate the content that they disseminate on their platforms."
There was no immediate response to emails Monday afternoon from DeSantis' press secretary or communications director on the ruling. DeSantis is running for reelection this year and eyeing a potential run for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination. He was the first governor to sign a bill like this into law, although similar ones have been proposed in other states.
One of those, in Texas, was allowed to go into effect by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and the tech companies involved there are asking for emergency U.S. Supreme Court review on whether to block it. No decision on that was immediately released.
The Computer & Communications Industry Association, a nonprofit group representing tech and communications companies, said the ruling represents a victory for internet users and free speech in general — especially as it relates to potentially offensive content.
"When a digital service takes action against problematic content on its own site — whether extremism, Russian propaganda, or racism and abuse — it is exercising its own right to free expression," said CCIA President Matt Schruers in a statement.
As enacted, the law would give Florida's attorney general authority to sue companies under the state's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. It would also allow individual Floridians to sue social media companies for up to $100,000 if they feel they've been treated unfairly.
The bill targeted social media platforms that have more than 100 million monthly users, which include online giants as Twitter and Facebook. But lawmakers carved out an exception for the Walt Disney Co. and their apps by including that theme park owners wouldn't be subject to the law.
The law would require large social media companies to publish standards on how it decides to "censor, deplatform, and shadow ban."
But the appeals court rejected nearly all of the law's mandates, save for a few lesser provisions in the law.
"Social media platforms exercise editorial judgment that is inherently expressive. When platforms choose to remove users or posts, deprioritize content in viewers' feeds or search results, or sanction breaches of their community standards, they engage in First-Amendment-protected activity," Newsom wrote for the court.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- Olympic Skier Lindsey Vonn Coming Out of Retirement at 40
- Website offers $1,000 for a 'Pumpkin Spice Pundit' to taste-test Trader Joe's fall items
- Debate Flares Over Texas’ Proposed Oil and Gas Waste Rule
- A utility investigated but didn’t find a gas leak before a fatal Maryland house explosion
- Week 10 fantasy football rankings: PPR, half-PPR and standard leagues
- 19 hurt after jail transport van collides with second vehicle, strikes pole northwest of Chicago
- Blue Jackets players, GM try to make sense of tragedy after deaths of Johnny and Matthew Gaudreau
- The Justice Department is investigating sexual abuse allegations at California women’s prisons
- Pie, meet donuts: Krispy Kreme releases Thanksgiving pie flavor ahead of holidays
- That photo of people wearing ‘Nebraska Walz’s for Trump’ shirts? They’re distant cousins
Ranking
- Tennessee suspect in dozens of rapes is convicted of producing images of child sex abuse
- Jessica Simpson Is a Proud Mom in Back to School Photo With All 3 Kids
- An appeals court upholds a ruling that an online archive’s book sharing violated copyright law
- When are the 2024 Emmy Awards? Date, nominees, hosts, how to watch
- Why the US celebrates Veterans Day and how the holiday has changed over time
- Why is Beijing interested in a mid-level government aide in New York State?
- Patrick Surtain II, Broncos agree to four-year, $96 million extension
- Man charged in death of dog breeder claims victim was killed over drug cartel
Recommendation
-
Olivia Munn Says She “Barely Knew” John Mulaney When She Got Pregnant With Their Son
-
Bill Belichick, Nick Saban were often brutal with media. Now they are media.
-
Megan Thee Stallion addresses beef with Nicki Minaj: 'Don't know what the problem is'
-
USA TODAY's NFL Survivor Pool is back: What you need to know to win $5K cash
-
Will Trump’s hush money conviction stand? A judge will rule on the president-elect’s immunity claim
-
Jason Kelce Thinks This Moment With Taylor Swift's Cats Will Be Hilarious
-
4 friends. 3 deaths, 9 months later: What killed Kansas City Chiefs fans remains a mystery
-
Michael Keaton Is Ditching His Stage Name for His Real Name After Almost 50 Years